Voice of
the diaspora is very important: Hari Krishnan
- Lalitha
Venkat, Chennai
e-mail: lalvenkat@yahoo.com
Photo: Cylla
von Tiedemann
November 27,
2006
Toronto-based
Hari Krishnan is a dancer, choreographer, teacher and dance scholar. He
works in a contemporary vein abstracting and drawing elements from a variety
of sources and sensibilities. Hari Krishnan's creative output is holistic,
combining the allied arts of Bharatanatyam dance, music, theatre and theory
with contemporary, urban, post-modern culture. Trained by hereditary dance
masters including K P Kittappa Pillai and R Muttukkannammal, Krishnan received
his M.A. degree in Dance from York University.
Artistic director
of Toronto-based inDANCE, Krishnan is also a World Dance Artist in Residence
at the Department of Dance in Wesleyan University (Connecticut, USA). His
experimental and vintage choreographies continue to be performed at international
venues. For close to a decade, Krishnan has been involved with the documentation,
translation and analysis of the last vestiges of hereditary systems of
dance in South India. His research brings together several interpretive
and theoretical approaches, as it integrates the disciplines of performance
studies, anthropology, history, and gender studies. Krishnan is currently
working with Canadian dance legend Margie Gillis, who is creating a solo
for him that will premiere in 2007.
Hari
Krishnan and inDANCE present an evening of contemporary dance on Dec 3,
2006 for The Other Festival at Museum Theatre (Chennai), 7pm.
Natya
Stem Dance Kampni, Arangham Trust and Alliance Francaise present inDANCE
on Dec 5, 2006 at Alliance Francaise (Bangalore), 7pm.
Hari Krishnan
talks to narthaki about his approach to traditional and contemporary dance
styles.
Trained
in classical Bharatanatyam, what motivated you to venture into contemporary
work? Are there any role models that inspired you to explore new forms?
If we approach
this idea from a critical-historical perspective, the reconstruction of
Bharatanatyam as a neo-classical dance form is already a clear break from
traditional devadasi dance. I see my explorations into contemporary
Bharatanatyam as a natural extension of this modernity. In terms of role
models, my devadasi teachers and nattuvanar masters continue
to inspire and fuel my artistic work. The eroticism, sensuality, and fluid
negotiation of gender roles and sexuality in devadasi dance is very
beautiful for me. Unfortunately this attitude, which I feel is in some
ways compatible with our modernity, was lost in the revival of Bharatanatyam
after the 1930s. It is this vision that I embrace both in my presentations
of devadasi repertoire as well as my experimental work.
Dancer Keshava
in Switzerland says people there want to learn Bollywood dancing and he's
even presenting Bollywood dance programs. Jhelum Paranjape's Odissi Bollywood
Ishtyle is very popular. How popular is Bollywood dance in Canada and US?
Bollywood
dance is clearly an extremely popular form. I feel this is due to the fact
that popular Indian cinema is so deeply rooted in ideas about Indian nationalism,
negotiating "traditional Indian culture," gender roles, etc. that have
a kind of nostalgic appeal for Indians living abroad. These issues are
also important in terms of the construction of hyphenated (i.e Indian-American,
Indo-Canadian) cultural and social identities. In the Indian diaspora,
Bollywood dance continues to be THE entry point and the primary cultural
marker of Indians living abroad.
On
one hand you are doing research on the devadasis. On the other, you
are into contemporary work and your latest is Bollywood Hopscotch. Are
you also inspired by the energy of Bollywood style of dancing?
My piece Bollywood
Hopscotch is not about replicating Bollywood dancing. I am not interested
in that. The piece questions the nature of modern Bharatanatyam and its
relationship to popular cinema. I am always interested in what happens
when elite art meets popular art - this has been happening in Bharatanatyam
since the 1940s, and today, I think that the boundaries between popular
art and elite art have completely disappeared. My choreography Bollywood
Hopscotch is a satire on the state of Indian classical dance today,
and its very hybrid permutations. This piece is my personal response to
concepts of melodrama and hyper-exaggeration and athleticism that characterize
modern Bharatanatyam. This is why in Bollywood Hopscotch the Bharatanatyam
abstract rhythmic dance sections meander organically into the various Bollywood
vignettes. The piece dramatizes the clash and dissonance between two colliding
aesthetic frameworks
You perform
mostly outside India. What do you think is the status of Indian contemporary
dance and classical dance in the diaspora? What do you think of the contemporary
dance scene in India as compared to outside India - by diaspora dancers?
Once again,
I strongly believe in dancers re-reading their histories and re-negotiating
their value systems on what words like "traditional" and "contemporaneity"
mean. All the classical forms in India are new forms, reconstructed and
reinvented after 1930s based on a variety of aesthetic, political and social
agendas. So for me, contemporary Indian dance is a natural (and somewhat
inevitable) evolution and extension of these new forms. With massive amount
of Indian dance being taught, performed and consumed outside of India,
I feel the voice of the diaspora is very important.
The new global
pathways in which Bharatanatyam has been circulating over the past 10-15
years can be divided into three major movements: (1) Classical dancers
who strive to re-create India / Chennai wherever they are in terms of presentation,
art production and audience development; (2) Classical dancers who somehow
feel motivated to create contemporary work because of what their peers
are doing or feel contemporary work creations are the only way to stand
out among the vast pool of competing classical dancers. The contemporary
creations coming out of this group very often use classical dance as a
safety net; (3) Contemporary artists who only create/perform modern work
and reject classical dance, very often dismissing it as cosmetic, redundant
or artificial.
For me, dance
artists should constantly take challenges and risks, always reinventing
themselves and progressing in their own artist development. Creating contemporary
work or classical work has its own set of problems and difficulties. Artists
should allow themselves to grow organically and not be compelled to churn
out work for the sake of creating something "that looks different" or lacks
meaning.
How easy
or difficult is to get funding to tour with your ensemble?
Internationally,
funding continues to be a tricky situation. Artists constantly have to
justify their medium, their artistic processes and their final outcome.
With so many dance artists from various cultural representations and various
genres, funding has become extremely competitive. The wonderful thing about
Canada is that funding is based on excellence and merit and I take great
pride that mediocrity in dance is carefully weeded out. I think that international
tours are very important for the growth of any dance company.
Contact
Hari Krishnan
Artistic Director,
inDANCE
21 River Street,
Studio 4
Toronto, Ontario
M5A 3P1, Canada
Tel: (416)
304-1690
Fax: (416)
304-0228
Email: indance@sympatico.ca
/ indance@gmail.com
www.indance.ca
|