Posted by anita ratnam on May 03, 2008 at 09:19:24:
In Reply to: Re: Anita Ratnam's letter to City Express posted by Prakruthi L. S on April 29, 2008 at 05:47:59:
Dear Prakruthi
well said
thanks for taking the time to post your opinions.
anita ratnam
: Dear Anita Madam,
: After reading the thread of discussions, one tends to go back to the basic difference between a review and an opinion. The former, in my humble opinion, has three key implicit connotations to it -
: a) An authority– A credibility established by expertise in the field rather than self-proclamation.
: b) A responsibility - Towards both the person/object of review in terms of offering advice/constructive criticism and towards the audience who may base their opinions, judgments and decisions on the review.
: c) An Objectivity - The maturity to steer clear of double entendres / repartees, to avoid generalizations and to be unbiased by personal impressions or prior experiences. I guess a review where verbiage takes precedence over objectivity is reflective of lack of credibility of the reviewer and stems from the insecurities of the reviewer.
:
: In a nutshell, while there are good and bad reviewers in this world, an opinion masquerading as a review (irrespective of whether it is blemishing or blandishing) is unforgivable since it is equally demeaning to the creation and damaging for the conceiver of any piece of creativity.
:
: Regards,
:
: Prakruthi L.S,
: Bangalore.