Gender
Switch! (Meaning no offence to any one in particular)
- Padmaja
Suresh, Bangalore
e-mail: padmajasuresh@hotmail.com
June 30, 2007
Women are suitable
to do both male and female roles but can the same be said of men? Worth
considering if there is a hidden man inside a woman (the word 'woman' also
approbates this) and what about vice versa? We should analyze first on
the external front and then the internal levels giving us a gender gallery
of contrast and congruity.
It is exciting
and enhancing for women to drape shirts and trousers designed to befit
their style or sometimes even without any variations by wearing typically
male clothes. But can one imagine men in sarees or any other typically
female attire? What men do can be imitated and to counterfeit their
appearance to deliberately create a semblance would still be for women,
in conformity with norms. If a woman could carry herself well with elegance
and grace alike, she becomes a true beauty; if she exudes confidence, courage
and determination, she becomes a true example; if she can fight a battle,
and also nurse the wounded, stare boldly yet shed tears, she becomes a
legend! But unfortunately though, a man seen crying, lamenting or moaning
without sufficient reasons could become a defaced and deformed figure,
not befitting his 'manhood.' Qualities of kindness, warmth, compassion
are also extolled in a man but are appealing only if veiled in his inherent,
habitual ‘ruggedness.’ Otherwise, he gets belittled and chided and a crude
word ‘effeminate’ gets attached to him.
The corollary
of the above is noticed in the world of Bharatanatyam as well. Ordinarily,
the dance of Shiva, Lord Nataraja (even His pose) requires the highest
brilliance, sheer pulsating tempo and a powerful vocabulary. If at all
one is capable of reproducing this, then maybe one or two shades of the
cosmic dance becomes visible in the dancer. This 'Tandavam' by both male
and female dancers exudes delight and aplomb. The other dance aspect of
'Lasya' which is the graceful and charming element is equally delectable
but care has to be taken while performed by a male dancer to see that this
effect does not linger beyond the stage limits and seep into his 'persona.'
It is commonly
remarked by many (meaning no offence to any one in particular) that many
a male dancer especially in Bharatanatyam, happens to sacrifice unknowingly,
his virile stride, mannerisms and 'macho' image. Instead, the kind of dance
articulations usually associated with women, look more pronounced in him
than his very own manliness. To tackle the situation, a pragmatic reaction
without emotional bias or penchant to this allegation is essential.
It is worth
noting here that male dancers rarely performed those days but often taught
as Nattuvanars. It is related to the Purusha - Prakriti dualism embodied
in the dualism of the human nature. Purusha (the macrocosm) remains unmoved
whereas Prakriti (containing the Purusha's atom or seed as microcosm) is
permitted to oscillate. It was felt 'not' without any grounds that a woman's
body is better suited for performing this dance, while a man's mind is
better at analyzing and teaching it. Learning from the traditional
lineage of male gurus gave the girls the best training to dance and blend
the dualities cohesively.
This disparity
and insinuation regarding the 'style' of male dancers would remain as long
as man’s age-old perception of beauty and philosophy of aesthetics having
been fortified by historical and mythological role models, would
remain…
Padmaja
Suresh is a classical dancer, choreographer, teacher and director of Kalpataru
Kalavihar, Institute of Arts, which has a charitable wing for training
lesser privileged children in performing arts. She is a commerce and Law
graduate, has a Masters in Philosophy and pursues a Phd from Mysore University
at present. |